The casus belli is the situation of an Albanian family seeking asylum that found itself on the street, a case that triggered a reaction from the Habitat et Citoyenneté and Tous Citoyens associations, who accused the Prefect of failing to render assistance and not respecting the law.
The subject lends itself more to pity than to polemics.
What can be said when faced with these dramatic cases, such as this one and so many others, not to feel powerless?
What does it matter if the Albanian family fell victim to an administrative regulation that, like all rules, adheres to criteria (law) different from those of humanity?
It’s good that some people have shown solidarity with the most disadvantaged and charity towards those in need, but what comes after?
The fact remains that the Prefect and the associations don’t share the same interpretation of the facts. Why be surprised, since they don’t have the same perspective?
The former, the Prefect, must handle the situation according to the legal provisions he is supposed to enforce and responds to accusations with actions, facts, and figures.
The others emphasize emotions and feelings. Some use the opportunity to promote their political involvement.
Each is justified from their point of view, but what follows? Are there lessons to be learned? Proposals to be made?
Even the renowned synthesis couldn’t work in this case.
Regarding the contested facts: “The family has not been subject to any eviction proceedings; they have received material support and now financial assistance, a monthly compensatory allowance increased to 860 € since December 2017 from the state services,” specifies the Prefect in a statement.
The Prefect’s final retort is scathing: ‘It would undoubtedly be useful for those who rushed to criticize the mobilization of state services, supported by the social services of local authorities, to educate themselves before making false statements.’
“Let the Prefect explain how a family of four is supposed to live on 860 euros a month,” the associations comment, demanding a roundtable discussion with the Prefect.
A dialogue of the deaf, indeed…
