Due to totally unnecessary controversies aimed at creating confusion in a case that is already quite complicated, we return to the disappearance of a family suspected of leaving for Syria.
The latest hypothesis could be to interpret it as a “kidnapping” even though there is no evidence yet to prove it. At the origin of this action is the father of one of the fugitives, who, however, does not go beyond mere conjecture.
Christian Estrosi, who has chosen to be the instigator in the situation concerning the jihadists from Nice, ignited the spark by accusing the state services of failing to intervene to block departures to combat zones.
According to him, he alerted them without any follow-up… as he says himself: “I informed the state services of the origin point, a clandestine place of worship, perfectly known to the services.” The accusation caused a bombshell effect because accusing the state services of negligence requires proof…
The denunciation by the mayor of Nice did not go unnoticed, and the prefect Adolphe Colrat did not hesitate to intervene and state his truth.
“It is in any case false to claim that the state services had been alerted of a possible expatriation, and it is equally inaccurate to assert that the police and gendarmerie, once warned, would not have fully mobilized. In the Alpes-Maritimes as well as across the entire national territory, the mobilization of the state services is total.”
And if instead of creating artificial controversies, we took into account the complexity of the problem?
Playing with fire serves no purpose.
