
But Force Ouvriรจre does not see it the same way. The union refuses to join the massive unified protest on June 17. Jean-Jacques Mai, general secretary of the FO 06 departmental union, recognizes โa significant issue, concerning salaries, pensions, and working hours.โ When asked about linking the different movements, he sees โno possibility: the ongoing movement in National Education will end as soon as the baccalaureate exams start on June 15. In companies, the only way to prevent the transition to 41 years of contribution for a full pension is a general interprofessional strike. The CFDT and the CGT are against it.โ He fears that the demands, defended for months, will never be granted. โThe texts are being debated right now in the National Assembly. They should be voted on this summer.โ
Still Ideas, But Fewer Ideals
For unions, May 1968 today is definitively part of the past. This does not deny the contribution of past struggles. The strike movements of 1968 and the 1970s brought significant social advances: the 40-hour workweek โ or two days off a week โ dates from this time, among others. โGains that need to be defended today,โ according to Jean-Jacques Mai. For Didier Turrini, the main differences with May 1968 are found in the ambitions of the protesters. โToday, we have much fewer prospects for the future: our dreams have been largely trampled, he says. We now work with our reality: precariousness, the working conditions of temporary workers or subcontractors, for example.โ
Bruno Della Sudda, candidate from NICEA (alternative left) in the last municipal elections, says society’s aspirations remain the same, in 1968 or today. โThe context is not the same, he recalls. In 1968, the economic situation was good, mass unemployment was unknown. Precarity affected fewer French people. In both cases, there is a questioning of the established order: in 1968 or in 2008, we aspire to a more just, more egalitarian, and more solidaristic society.โ

